CapeDave wrote:Hey I was not the first to bring up colonoscopy's.
YesCapeDave wrote:Could I have asked or replied differently ahhhh .
No one is questioning your business or practices as far as I have read. Maybe think about getting that chip off your shoulder... and personally I could care less whether you have friends or not.. we are professionals here. if you got a technical question, by all means ask it.. if you don't like the answer, feel free to go elsewhere for an opinion you are happy with.You all are questioning my business or if I have any friends?
and a couple of admins. as noted it started with your original post and reply to the response... jumping all over someone for mis understanding a poorly worded and titled post isn't a way to make a good impression.Wow what children.
And it comes from a moderator ?? And the rest of the internet bully's hop on the train.
No one doubts that - plenty of us know very well that is the case. 7 out of 10 of these that have the carb removed (for known running issues) show that to be the case. and from experience, we have had a few where the carb was *looked at* since it was removed anyway for other service, the float level was just fine and engine ran right after the other issues were fixed - without doing anything to the carburetor (since it was just a case of pop the bowl off, take a look, and pop it back on.. a couple did need new bowl gaskets due to the effects of ethanol fuel swelling the gasket.). - short answer, if the engine runs correctly, the float level may safely be assumed to be just fine and not an issue, thus, no reason to R&R the carb and check float level as part of a tune-up, which your original post (that started this whole mess) implied.
Try this take 10 known and running B/S engines with the replaceable seat and check the float level and report back what you find.
Return to The Break Room AKA General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests